Years back I heard of a
congregation that read only from the first book and a half of the Torah--
Genesis and half of Exodus, Shabbat morning. As you know, traditionally, we read from all
Five Books of the Torah in the course of our weekly Sabbath morning services.
The reason this congregation read only through the first book and a half of the
Torah was because that is where all of the exciting stories are. Once one gets
beyond the Exodus from Egypt and the building of the Golden Calf, the narrative
parts of the Torah get fewer and fewer. By the time one gets to the Book of
Leviticus, where we are this week, the narrative grinds to a halt. There are
but two brief stories in the Book of Leviticus. The rest of the Book of
Leviticus is as filled with mitzvoth as a pomegranate with seeds.
Having read about the completion
and erection of the Mishkan in last week’s final chapter of Exodus, the Book of
Leviticus opens by outlining the five major types of sacrifices that can be
offered there. The first type, the Olah, means “going up”. It was offered to
atone for a person’s sinful thoughts or ideas, which “come up” in one’s mind. Its purpose was to help the worshipper raise
the state of his or her spiritual level.
Whereas the olah is an animal
offering, the second type of sacrifice, the mincha, is an offering of flour,
oil, and frankincense. It was
inexpensive, probably for people who could not afford an animal offering. The message was that spiritual elevation is
available to all, regardless of their financial situation.
The type of sacrifice known as zevach
shlamim was brought by a person or a group of people. This offering was meant to
express gratitude for G-d’s goodness and love of G-d. This animal sacrifice was eaten at a communal
feast. Finally the Hatat and the Asham sacrifices
were brought when one sinned and felt guilty. In bringing the Hatat or the
Asham, one was asking forgiveness from G-d.
The Torah goes into great detail as
to how these sacrifices were to be offered to G-d by the priests. It enumerates
which parts of an animal were to be given to G0d, which parts were to be
retained by the priests for their personal consumption, which were to be eaten
by the person who brought the offering, and on and on. It is little wonder that
some congregations would prefer to skip the whole thing.
Furthermore, it is irrelevant to
our lives today. As we all know, animal
and grain sacrifices ceased when the Second Temple was destroyed. There is a
poignant story about Rabbi Johanan ben Zakkai and his student, Rabbi Joshua, as
they looked upon the Temple ruins. Rabbi Joshua bemoans the fact that with the
Temple destroyed, Jews no longer have a way to atone for their sins. Rabbi
Johanan ben Zakkai replies that he ought not despair. Atonement for sins, he
says, can still be gained through acts of charity and justice. This story illustrates both the feelings of loss that Jews have experienced throughout our history, as well as the adaption to loss that has been the key to Jewish survival throughout the ages.
The Temple in Jerusalem, however,
was more than just a place for worship – it was the central symbol of Jewish
sovereignty and national identity. That is why the Romans destroyed it in the
first place, and that is why they never allowed the Jewish people to rebuild
it. Nevertheless, throughout the ages Jews yearned to rebuild the Temple. In
fact the rabbis added an entire section of prayer to our Sabbath Worship
service to express that longing. The traditional Musaf service, which is named
after the musaf, or additional sacrifice that was offered at the Temple on
Shabbat, contains within it prayers to G-d to restore the Temple and to resume
animal sacrifices.
The Modern American Reform Movement
eliminated the Musaf service in its first published prayer book in 1856. The
thinking was that the very mention of animal sacrifices obstructs rather than
enhances the cultivation of spirituality for the modern American Jew. Subsequent
prayer books of the Reform Movement followed suit.
In 1945 the Conservative Movement
made a break with tradition by changing the wording of some of the traditional
prayers in the Musaf service. They kept the Musaf service, with its focus on
the Temple and the sacrificial system, but adapted the language to conform to
modern sensibilities. They recognized American Jews had no desire to return to
animal sacrifice as a system of worship. The Conservative Movement therefore changed
the wording of the prayers to express the hope that we modern worshippers be as
devoted to our form of worship as our ancestors were to theirs. Thus
they maintained the link to the past while recognizing and acknowledging that sacrificial
offerings constituted a stage in the evolution of our religion that we had long
left behind and to which we did not wish to return.
The Jewish Reconstructionist
Foundation also published its first prayer book in 1945. It eliminated the Musaf
service entirely, as well as references to Jews as the “chosen people”,
resurrection of the dead, and the hope for a Messiah. These changes so enraged
the Orthodox community that on June 12, 1945, two hundred Orthodox rabbis
gathered for a ceremony in New York in which Rabbi Mordechai Kaplan, the chief
author of the prayer book, was excommunicated and his new prayer book burned.
Today the passions aroused by
liturgical innovations have abated. The Reform Movement in Israel has added a
prayer “in memory of the Musaf service” and the Reconstructionist Movement
advises that those who want to add a musaf service be permitted to do so. Not
all of our fellow Jews, however, have come to terms with the elimination of sacrifice
as a form of worship. These religious nationalists see in the restoration of
sovereignty of the State of Israel over Jerusalem the first divinely ordained
step toward the building of a Third Temple and the re-instituting of the
sacrificial cult of Biblical times. That is another sermon, for another time.
Shabbat Shalom
Shabbat Shalom
No comments:
Post a Comment